ANNUAL REPORT |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
| Realty Income
Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 |
||
| 1. Organization and Operation | ||
| Realty Income Corporation (the "Company") was
organized in the state of Delaware in September 1993 to facilitate the merger, which was
effected on August 15, 1994 (the "Consolidation"), of 10 private and 15 public
real estate limited partnerships (the "Partnerships") with and into the Company.
The Company invests in commercial real estate and has elected to be taxed as a real estate
investment trust ("REIT"). Investors in the Partnerships who elected to invest in the Company received common stock of the Company totaling 19,503,080 shares. Certain investors elected to receive Variable Rate Senior Notes (the "Notes") totaling $12.6 million. The Consolidation was accounted for as a reorganization of affiliated entities under common control in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests. Under this method, the assets and liabilities of the Partnerships were carried over at their historical book values and their operations have been recorded on a combined historical cost basis. The pooling-of-interests method of accounting also requires the reporting of the results of operations as though the entities had been combined as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. Accordingly, the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1994 comprise those of the separate entities combined from January 1, 1994 through August 15, 1994 and those of the Company from August 16, 1994 through December 31, 1994. Costs incurred to effect the Consolidation and integrate the continuing operations of the separate entities were expenses of the Company in the period the Consolidation was consummated. Prior to the Consolidation, the Company had no significant operations; therefore, the combined operations for the period prior to the Consolidation represent the operations of the Partnerships. The Consolidation did not require any material adjustments to conform the accounting policies of the separate entities to that of the Company. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
||
| The results of operations of the previously separate entities for the period before the Consolidation was consummated that are included in the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1994 follow: | ||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
| 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ||
| Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
partnerships more than 50 percent owned (subsidiaries) after elimination of all material
intercompany balances and transactions. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash and have an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation of buildings and improvements and amortization of goodwill are computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of approximately 25 years. Leases All leases are accounted for as operating leases. Under this method, lease payments are recognized as revenue over the term of the lease on a straight-line basis. Income Taxes Prior to the Consolidation, the Companys operations were conducted through private and public real estate limited partnerships. In accordance with partnership taxation, each partner was responsible for reporting its share of taxable income. Accordingly, no federal income tax provision has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements prior to August 16, 1994. After August 15, 1994, the Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Management believes the Company has qualified and continues to qualify as a REIT and therefore will be permitted to deduct distributions paid to its stockholders, eliminating the federal taxation of income represented by such distributions at the Companys level. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the period August 16, 1994 through December 31, 1994 and the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995. Distributions Paid and Payable For the year ended December 31, 1996, cash distributions of $2.0925 per share were paid. The 1996 distributions were paid as a special distribution of $0.23 per share, eleven monthly distributions of $0.155 per share and one distribution of $0.1575 per share. As of December 31, 1996, a distribution of $0.1575 per share was declared and payable. For the year ended December 31, 1995, cash distributions of $1.825 per share were paid. The 1995 distributions were paid as seven monthly distributions of $0.15 per share and five monthly distributions of $0.155 per share. As of December 31, 1995, three distributions totaling $0.54 per share were declared and payable. For the period August 16, 1994 through December 31, 1994, cash distributions of $0.60 per share were paid. The 1994 distributions were paid as four monthly distributions of $0.15 per share. The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of distributions paid or deemed to be paid to stockholders for the years ended December 31: |
||
![]() |
||
| For tax purposes, a portion of the distributions payable
at December 31, 1995, in the amount of $0.144 per share, is deemed to be paid in 1995.
This amount is included in the $1.876 per share taxable as ordinary income in 1995 and
represents the remaining portion of taxable earnings and profits which were assumed by the
Company in the merger with R.I.C. Advisor, Inc. (the "Advisor"). Provision for Impairment Losses The Company reviews long-lived assets, including goodwill, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Generally, a provision is made for impairment loss if estimated future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) over a long-term holding period plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current book value. If properties are held for sale, they are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less cost to sell. For the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1994, provisions for impairment losses of $579,000 and $135,000, respectively, were charged to operations to reduce the net carrying value of four properties held for sale in 1996 and one property held for sale in 1994. There was no provision for impairment losses for the year ended December 31, 1995. Net Income Per Share Net income per share for 1996 and 1995 was calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares and common stock equivalents outstanding during the year. Net income per share for 1994 was calculated assuming 19,502,091 shares of the Companys common stock were outstanding. Prior to the Consolidation, no shares of common stock were outstanding. Stock Option Plan The Company accounts for its stock option plan in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations. As such, compensation expense would be recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. On January 1, 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," ("SFAS 123") which permits entities to recognize as expense over the vesting period the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. Alternatively, SFAS 123 also allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for employee stock option grants made in 1995 and future years as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS 123 had been applied. The Company has elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS 123. Derivative Financial Instrument The Company uses an interest rate treasury lock agreement to hedge the effect of interest rate fluctuations. This instrument meets the requirement for hedge accounting, including a high correlation to a specific transaction. Accordingly, amounts receivable or payable under the terms of the agreement and changes in market value are recognized in income when the effects of related changes of the hedge item are recognized. Reclassifications Certain of the 1995 and 1994 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 1996 presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on stockholders equity or net income. Use of Estimates Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
||
| Top | ||
| 3. Credit Facility Available for Acquisitions | ||
| The Company has a $130 million, three-year, revolving,
unsecured acquisition credit facility that expires in November 1999. The credit facility
is from The Bank of New York, as agent, and several major U.S. and non-U.S. banks. As of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, the outstanding balance on the credit facility was $70.0
million and $6.0 million, respectively, with an effective interest rate of approximately
6.85% and 7.19%, respectively. A commitment fee of 0.15%, per annum accrues on the average
amount of the unused available credit commitment. The credit facility is subject to various leverage and interest coverage ratio limitations, all of which the Company is and has been in compliance with. In 1996 and 1995, interest of $150,000 and $217,000, respectively, was capitalized on properties under construction. No interest was capitalized in 1994. |
||
| 4. Notes Payable | ||
| On March 29, 1996, the Company redeemed, at par, the $12.6 million principal amount of Notes. Interest incurred on the Notes for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $217,000, $997,000 and $332,000, respectively. | ||
| 5. Operating Leases | ||
| A. General At December 31, 1996, the Company owned
740 properties in 42 states. Of the Companys properties, 732 are single-tenant and
the remainder are multi-tenant. At December 31, 1996, nine properties were vacant and
available for lease or sale. Substantially all leases are net leases whereby the tenant pays property taxes and assessments, maintains the interior and exterior of the building, and carries insurance coverage for public liability, property damage, fire, and extended coverage. The Companys leases are primarily for initial terms of 10 to 20 years and provide for limited cost of living increases and/or increased rent based upon a percentage of the tenants sales. Percentage rent for 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $1.7 million, $1.6 million and $2.6 million, respectively. |
||
| As of December 31, 1996, minimum annual rents to be received on the operating leases are as follows (dollars in thousands): | ||
![]() |
||
| B. Major Tenants The following schedule presents rental income, including percentage rents, from tenants representing more than 10% of the Companys total revenue for at least one of the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 or 1994 (dollars in thousands): | ||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
| 6. Net Gain on Sales of Properties | ||
| In 1996, the Company sold seven properties for a total of $4.4 million and recognized a gain of $1.5 million. In 1995, the Company sold three properties for a total of $617,000 and recognized a net gain of $18,000. In 1994, the Company sold five properties and had three land easement transactions for a total of $3.8 million and recognized a net gain of $1.2 million. | ||
| 7. The Merger of R.I.C. Advisor, Inc. | ||
| On August 17, 1995, the Company merged with the Advisor
and issued 990,704 shares of the Companys common stock valued at approximately $21.2
million (the "Merger"). The Merger was accounted for using the purchase method.
Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to assets acquired based on their estimated
fair values. This treatment resulted in approximately $22.9 million of goodwill.
Amortization of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 was $916,000 and
$340,000, respectively. The following unaudited pro forma summary presents information as if the Merger had occurred at the beginning of the period presented. The pro forma information is provided for information purposes only. It is based on historical information and does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations of the combined company. |
||
![]() |
||
| 8. Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ||
| Management of the Company believes that the carrying values reflected in the balance sheets at December 31, 1996 and 1995 reasonably approximate the fair values for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, due from affiliates and all liabilities. In making such assessments, the Company utilized estimates and quoted market prices. See note 13. | ||
| 9. Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | ||
| Interest paid during 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $1,987,000,
$2,186,000 and $354,000, respectively. The following non-cash investing and financing activities are included in the accompanying financial statements: A. Distributions payable totaled $3.6 million and $12.4 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. B. In 1996, due from affiliates of $183,000 was reclassified to goodwill, related to the resolution of a pre-acquisition contingency. C. The Merger of the Advisor into the Company on August 17, 1995 resulted in the following (dollars in thousands): |
||
![]() |
||
| In 1995, other assets of $95,000 were reclassified to
goodwill. Common stock retired after the Merger includes par value of common stock and
capital in excess of par value of $58,000 and $1,172,000, respectively. D. In 1996 and 1995, pursuant to the assumption of the defined benefit pension plan by the Company (Note 11), the Company recorded a due from affiliate and a liability (included in other liabilities) of $73,000 and $493,000, respectively. This represents the amount of the increase in the liability to the plan, of which the Company is indemnified by the former shareholders of the Advisor. E. In 1994, the following increases occurred resulting from exchanges of limited partnership units for Notes payable and Common Stock (dollars in thousands): |
||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
| 10. Related Party Transactions | ||
| A. Advisory Agreement
In August 1994, in connection with the Consolidation, the Company entered into an
advisory agreement under which R.I.C. Advisor, Inc. advised the Company with respect to
its investments and assumed day-to-day management of the Company (the "Advisory
Agreement"). The Advisory Agreement provided for a monthly advisor fee equal to
0.1189% of the appraised value of the real estate properties as of the Consolidation date
plus the current book value of the non-real estate assets of the Company. Amounts incurred
under the Advisory Agreement for the period from January 1, 1995 through August 17, 1995
and August 15, 1994 through December 31, 1994 were $3.7 million and $2.2 million,
respectively. Prior to the Consolidation, the general partners of the Partnerships
received management fees and reimbursements from the Partnerships (Note 10B). On August
17, 1995, the Advisor was merged into the Company (Note 7). As part of the Merger, the
Advisory Agreement was terminated. B. Related Party Transactions Prior to the Consolidation Cash Distributions The Advisor and William E. and Evelyn J. Clark, the former general partners of the Partnerships, collectively, received distributions of $342,000 for the period from January 1, 1994 through August 15, 1994. Management Fees and Administrative Expenses For the period from January 1, 1994 through August 15, 1994, the Advisor received management fees of $432,000 and reimbursements for personnel and overhead costs incurred to administer the operations of the Partnerships of $2.8 million. These administrative expenses and management fees are included in advisor fees in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. |
||
| 11. Employee Benefit Plan | ||
| As a result of the Merger on August 17, 1995, the Company
assumed a defined benefit pension plan (the "Plan") covering substantially all
of its employees. The Plans benefit formulas generally based payments to retired
employees upon their length of service and a percentage of qualifying compensation during
the final years of employment. The Companys funding policy was to contribute
annually the amount necessary to satisfy the Internal Revenue Services funding
standards. The Plan did not provide for funding of prior service costs. The board of directors of the Advisor froze the Plan effective May 31, 1995. No additional employees were entitled to enter the Plan after May 31, 1995. For each Plan participant, the accrued benefit earned under the Plan was frozen as of May 31, 1995. The Plan was terminated on January 2, 1996. Final disbursement of the Plans assets occurred on February 24, 1997. The following table sets forth the Plans funded status and amounts recognized in the Companys consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 (dollars in thousands): |
||
![]() |
||
| At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is included in other liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet. In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed a benefit obligation of $1.9 million. The Merger agreement provides for indemnification by the former shareholders of the Advisor with respect to increases in the benefit obligation. A receivable from the Advisors former shareholders has been recorded as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 for $383,000 and $493,000, respectively, and is included as due from affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, which offsets the Companys benefit obligation. | ||
| 12. Stock Incentive Plan | ||
| In September 1993, the board of directors of the Company
approved a stock incentive plan (the "Stock Plan") designed to attract and
retain directors, officers and employees of the Company by enabling such individuals to
participate in the ownership of the Company. The Stock Plan provides for the award
(subject to ownership limitations) of a broad variety of stock-based compensation
alternatives such as nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock
and performance awards. The Company adopted the disclosure-only option under SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," as of January 1, 1996. If the accounting provisions of SFAS 123 had been adopted as of the beginning of 1996, the effect on 1996 net income and net income per share would have been immaterial. Furthermore, based on current and anticipated use of stock options, it is not anticipated that the impact of the provisions of SFAS 123 would be material in any future period. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the stocks fair market value at the date of grant. Stock options expire 10 years from the date they are granted and vest over service periods of three and four years. At December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, options outstanding totaled 73,000, 30,000 and 30,000, respectively. Management believes that the impact of these options on the financial position and results of operations are immaterial and it is not anticipated that the impact of the options would be material in any future period. |
||
| 13. Derivative Financial Instrument | ||
| The Company has only limited involvement with a derivative
financial instrument and does not use it for trading purposes. The derivative financial
instrument is used to manage well-defined interest rate risks. In December 1996, the Company entered into a treasury interest rate lock agreement to hedge against rising interest rates applicable to its anticipated debt offering. Under the interest rate lock agreement, which is in the notional amount of $90 million, the Company receives or makes a payment based on the differential between a specified interest rate (6.537%) and the actual 10-year treasury interest rate. Based on the December 31, 1996 10-year treasury interest rate, the Company has an unrecognized loss of $80,000. The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to this agreement. The Company did not obtain collateral to support the financial instrument but monitors the credit standing of the counterparty and anticipates that the counterparty will be able to fully satisfy its obligation under the contract. |
||
| 14. Commitments and Contingencies | ||
| In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is a party to various legal actions which the Company believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of the Company. The Company believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its consolidated operations, financial position or liquidity. | ||
| Top | ||
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND
STOCKHOLDERS Realty Income Corporation: |
||
| We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets of Realty Income Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996 (Note 1). These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Realty Income Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. |
||
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP |
||
| San Diego, California January 24, 1997, except as to paragraph two of Note 11, which is as of February 24, 1997 |
||
| Realty Income Corporation
and Subsidiaries Business Description |
||
| The Company | ||
| Realty Income Corporation ("Realty Income" or
the "Company") is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed Real
Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") which management believes is the nations
largest publicly-traded owner of freestanding, single-tenant, retail properties
diversified geographically and by industry and operated under net lease agreements. As of
January 1, 1997, the Company owned a diversified portfolio of 740 properties located in 42
states with over 5.2 million square feet of leasable space. Approximately 99% of the
Companys properties were leased as of January 1, 1997. Unless otherwise indicated,
information regarding the Companys properties is as of January 1, 1997. Realty Income adheres to a focused strategy of acquiring freestanding, single-tenant, retail properties leased to national and regional retail chains under long-term, net lease agreements. The Company typically acquires, and then leases back, retail store locations from retail chain store operators, providing capital to the operators for continued expansion and other purposes. The Companys net lease agreements generally are for initial terms of 10 to 20 years, require the tenant to pay a minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses (taxes, insurance and maintenance), and provide for future rent increases based on limited increases in the consumer price index or additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants gross sales above a specified level. Since 1970, Realty Income has acquired and leased back to national and regional retail chains over 700 properties (including 25 properties that have been sold) and has collected in excess of 98% of the original contractual rent obligations on those properties. Realty Income believes that the long-term ownership of an actively managed, diversified portfolio of retail properties leased under long-term, net lease agreements will produce consistent, predictable income and the potential for long-term capital appreciation. Management believes that long-term leases, coupled with tenants assuming responsibility for property expenses under the net lease structure, generally produce a more predictable income stream than many other types of real estate portfolios. As of January 1, 1997, the Companys single-tenant properties were leased pursuant to leases with an average remaining term (excluding extension options) of approximately 8.6 years. The Company was formed on September 9, 1993 in the State of Delaware. Realty Income commenced operations as a REIT on August 15, 1994 through the merger of 25 public and private real estate limited partnerships with and into the Company (the "Consolidation"). Each of the partnerships was formed between 1970 and 1989 for the purpose of acquiring and managing long-term, net leased properties. The Company is a fully integrated real estate company with in-house acquisition, leasing, legal, financial underwriting, portfolio management and capital markets expertise. The seven senior officers of the Company, who have each managed the Companys properties and operations for between six and 27 years, owned approximately 3.9% of the Companys outstanding common stock as of February 28, 1997. Realty Income has 35 employees as of February 1, 1997. |
||
| Recent Developments | ||
| During 1996, the Company has continued implementing its growth plan, which is intended to increase the Companys funds from operations ("FFO") per share. FFO per share increased 4.0% in 1996 to $2.08 compared to $2.00 in 1995. FFO is defined as net income before net gain on sales of properties, plus provision for impairment losses on properties held for sale, plus depreciation and amortization. As part of its growth plan, in 1996 and from the date of the Consolidation through December 31, 1996, the Company acquired 62 and 124 additional net leased retail properties, respectively, with an aggregate initial annual contractual base rent of approximately $6.2 million and $14.0 million, respectively. | ||
| Increase in Monthly Distribution In December 1996, the Company increased its monthly distribution to $0.1575 per share from $0.155 per share, representing an increase of 1.6%. The Company has paid monthly distributions of $0.1575 per share in December 1996 through March 1997. The monthly distribution of $0.1575 per share represents a current annualized distribution of $1.89 per share, and an annualized distribution yield of approximately 7.3% based on the last reported sale price of the Companys Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") of $25.875 on February 24, 1997. Although the Company expects to continue its policy of paying monthly distributions, there can be no assurance that the current level of distributions will be maintained by the Company or as to the actual distribution yield for any future period. | ||
| Investment Grade Credit Rating The Company received an investment grade corporate credit rating from Duff & Phelps Rating Company, Moodys Investor Service, Inc., and Standard & Poors. Duff & Phelps assigned a rating of BBB, Moodys Baa3, and Standard & Poors BBB-. | ||
| Acquisition of 62 Net Leased, Retail Properties During 1996, the Company has increased the size of its portfolio through a strategic program of acquisitions. The Company has acquired 62 additional properties (the "New Properties"), and selectively sold seven properties, increasing the number of properties in its portfolio by 8.0% from 685 properties to 740 properties during 1996. Of the New Properties, 57 were occupied as of February 1, 1997 and the remaining five were pre-leased and under construction pursuant to contracts under which the tenants have agreed to develop the properties (with development costs funded by the Company) and to begin paying rent when the premises open for business. The New Properties were acquired for an aggregate cost of approximately $55.5 million (excluding the estimated unfunded development costs totaling $3.8 million on five properties under construction and seven pending final construction funding), are located in 22 states, will contain approximately 603,900 leasable square feet and are 100% leased under net leases, with an average initial lease term of 11.7 years. The weighted average annual return on the cost of the New Properties (excluding the estimated cost of properties under construction) is estimated to be 10.6%, computed as estimated contractual net operating income (which in the case of a net leased property is equal to the base rent or, in the case of properties under construction, the estimated base rent under the lease) for the first year of each lease, divided by total acquisition and estimated development costs. Since it is possible that a tenant could default on the payment of contractual rent, no assurance can be given that the actual return on the cost of the New Properties will not differ from the foregoing percentage. | ||
| Variable Senior Note Redemption On March 29, 1996, the Company redeemed, at par, the $12.6 million principal amount of variable rate senior notes due 2001. The notes were issued in 1994 as part of the Consolidation. | ||
| Top | ||
| PROPERTIES | ||
| As of January 1, 1997, Realty Income owned a diversified portfolio of 740 properties in 42 states consisting of over 5.2 million square feet of leasable space. The following table sets forth certain geographic diversification information regarding these properties: | ||
![]() |
||
| Realty Incomes 740 properties consist of 153 after-market automotive retail locations (80 automotive parts stores and 73 automotive service locations), 319 child care centers, 36 consumer electronics stores, 42 convenience stores, 4 home furnishings stores, 173 restaurant facilities, and 13 other properties. Of the 740 properties, 672 or 91% are leased to national or major regional retail chain operators; 43 or 6% are leased to franchisees of retail chain operators; 16 or 2% are leased to other tenant types; and nine or 1% are available for lease. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Companys properties as of January 1, 1997, classified according to the business of the respective tenants: | ||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
| Realty Income Corporation and
Subsidiaries Managements Discussion and Analysis |
||
| GENERAL | ||
| Realty Income Corporation ("Realty Income" or
the "Company") was organized to operate as an equity real estate investment
trust ("REIT"). The Companys primary business objective is to generate a
consistent and predictable level of funds from operations ("FFO") per share and
distributions to stockholders. Additionally, the Company generally will seek to increase
FFO per share and distributions to stockholders through both internal and external growth,
while also seeking to lower the ratio of distributions to stockholders as a percentage of
FFO in order to allow internal cash flow to be used to fund additional acquisitions and
for other corporate purposes. Realty Income pursues internal growth through (i)
contractual rent increases on existing leases; (ii) rental increases at the termination of
existing leases when market conditions permit; and (iii) the active management of the
Companys property portfolio, including selective sales of properties. The Company
generally pursues external growth through the acquisition of additional properties under
long-term, net lease agreements with initial contractual base rent which, at the time of
acquisition, is in excess of the Companys estimated cost of capital. The Companys common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the symbol "O" and commenced trading on October 18, 1994. Realty Income was organized in the state of Delaware on September 9, 1993 to facilitate the merger, which was effective on August 15, 1994 (the "Consolidation"), of 10 private and 15 public real estate limited partnerships (the "Partnerships") with and into Realty Income. Investors in the Partnerships who elected to invest in the equity of the Company received a total of 19,503,080 shares of common stock. Certain investors elected to receive Variable Rate Senior Notes due 2001 (the "Notes") totaling $12.6 million. The Consolidation was accounted for as a reorganization of affiliated entities in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests. Under this method, the assets and liabilities of the Partnerships were carried over at their historical book values and operations have been recorded on a combined historical cost basis. The pooling-of-interests method of accounting also requires the reporting of the results of operations as though the entities had been combined as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. Accordingly, the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1994 comprise those of the separate entities combined from the beginning of the period through August 15, 1994 (the date of the Consolidation) and those of the Company from August 16, 1994 through December 31, 1994. Prior to August 17, 1995, the Companys day-to-day affairs were managed by R.I.C. Advisor, Inc. (the "Advisor") which provided advice and assistance regarding acquisitions of properties by the Company and performed the day-to-day management of the Companys properties and business. On August 17, 1995, the Advisor was merged with and into Realty Income (the "Merger") and the advisory agreement between Realty Income and the Advisor was terminated. Realty Income issued 990,704 shares of common stock as consideration for the outstanding common stock of the Advisor. In July 1996, the Company expanded its board of directors to seven members. The new directors are Richard J. VanDerhoff, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and Willard H. Smith, Jr, formerly a Managing Director, Equity Capital Markets Division, of Merrill Lynch & Co from 1983 until his retirement in August 1995. In October 1996, the Company changed transfer agents from Chase Mellon Shareholder Services to The Bank of New York. |
||
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | ||
| Cash Reserves Realty Income was organized for the
purpose of operating as an equity REIT which acquires and leases properties and
distributes to stockholders, in the form of monthly cash distributions, a substantial
portion of its net cash flow generated from lease revenue. The Company intends to retain
an appropriate amount of cash as working capital reserves. At December 31, 1996, the
Company had cash and cash equivalents totaling $1.6 million. Management believes that the Companys cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash provided from operating activities and borrowing capacity are sufficient to meet its liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. |
||
| Top | ||
| Capital Funding
Realty Income has a $130 million three-year, revolving, unsecured acquisition credit
facility that expires in November 1999. The credit facility currently bears interest at
1.25% over the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and offers the Company
other interest rate options. As of February 7, 1997, $55.5 million of borrowing capacity
was available to the Company under the acquisition credit facility. At that time, the
outstanding balance was $74.5 million. On March 29, 1996, this credit facility was used to
redeem the Notes at par, and has been and is expected to be used to acquire additional
retail properties leased to national and regional retail chains under long term lease
agreements. Any additional borrowings will increase the Companys exposure to
interest rate risk. Realty Income expects to meet its long-term capital needs for the acquisition of properties through the issuance of public or private debt or equity. In August 1995, the Company filed a universal shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering up to $200 million in value of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities. In the fourth quarter of 1995, the Company issued 2,540,000 shares of common stock at a price of $19.625 per share. The net proceeds were primarily used to repay borrowings under the acquisition credit facility. These borrowings were used to acquire properties in 1995. In December 1996, the Company entered into a treasury interest rate lock agreement to hedge against the possibility of rising interest rates. Under the interest rate lock agreement, the Company receives or makes a payment based on the differential between a specified interest rate, 6.537%, and the actual 10-year treasury interest rate on notional principal of $90 million, at the end of six months. Based on the 10-year treasury interest rate at December 31, 1996, the Company has a deferred loss on the agreement of $79,800. The Company anticipates issuing debt during the second quarter of 1997, subject to market conditions and acquisition levels. The Company is not currently involved in any negotiations and has not entered into any arrangements relating to any additional securities issuances. During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company received investment grade corporate credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from Duff & Phelps Rating Co., Moodys Investor Services, Inc. and Standard and Poors, of BBB, Baa3, and BBB-, respectively. |
||
| Property Acquisitions
During 1996, Realty Income purchased 62 retail properties (the "New Properties")
in 22 states for $55.5 million (excluding the estimated unfunded development costs of $3.8
million on five properties under development and seven properties pending final
construction funding). These 62 properties will contain approximately 603,900 leasable
square feet and are 100% leased under net leases, with an average initial lease term of
11.7 years. The weighted average annual unleveraged return on the cost of the 62
properties is estimated to be 10.6%, computed as estimated contractual net operating
income (which in the case of a net leased property is equal to the base rent or, in the
case of properties under construction, the estimated base rent under the lease) for the
first year divided by the total acquisition and estimated development costs. Since it is
possible that a tenant could default on the payment of contractual rent, no assurance can
be given that the actual return on the cost of the 62 properties acquired in 1996 will not
differ from the foregoing percentage. Of the 62 properties acquired in 1996, 57 were occupied as of February 1, 1997 and the remaining five were pre-leased and under construction pursuant to contracts under which the tenants have agreed to develop the properties (with development costs funded by the Company) and to begin paying rent when the premises open for business. All of the New Properties, including the properties under development, are leased with initial terms of 7.75 to 20 years. The allocation of costs between land, and buildings and improvements on the 57 completed and occupied New Properties was approximately 34% and 66%, respectively. During 1996 the Company purchased a property which was adjacent to an existing tenant for $102,000 and leased the property to that tenant. The Company also invested $37,000 in existing properties, received equipment and other assets valued at $58,000 as settlements for amounts receivable, and purchased the outstanding Class A units in R.I.C. Trade Center, Ltd., Silverton Business Center, Ltd. and Empire Business Center, Ltd. for an aggregate of $150,000. After this purchase, Realty Income owned 100% of these partnerships, which were then dissolved. These partnerships owned three mixed-use light industrial business parks in San Diego, CA. 1996 Acquisition Activity |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
| Top | ||
| Distributions
Cash distributions paid for the years ended December 31,1996,1995 and 1994 were
$48.1 million, $36.7 million and $44.7 million, respectively. The 1996 cash distributions
include a special distribution of $5.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company paid 11 monthly distributions of $0.155 per share and increased the monthly distributions to $0.1575 per share in December 1996. The regular distributions paid during 1996 totaled $1.8625 per share. In addition, the Company paid a special distribution of $0.23 per share in January 1996. Total distributions paid in 1996 were $2.0925 per share. For tax purposes, a portion of the special distribution, in the amount of approximately $0.144 per share, was taxable as ordinary income in 1995 and the remaining $0.086 per share was included in each stockholders 1996 Form 1099. In December 1996, and January and February 1997, the Company declared distributions of $0.1575 per share which were paid on January 15, 1997, February 17, 1997 and payable on March 18, 1997, respectively. For the year ended December 31,1995, the Company paid monthly distributions of $0.15 per share from January through July and increased its monthly distributions to $0.155 per share in August. Monthly distributions of $0.155 per share were paid in August through December 1995. The distributions paid for 1995 totaled $1.825 per share. The 1994 distributions were made up of eight partnership and four corporate monthly distributions in the aggregate amount of $38.9 million and the final partnership distribution of $5.8 million. The 1994 final partnership distributions were substantially comprised of proceeds from the sales of properties sold during 1993. From August 15,1994, the date of the Consolidation, through December 31,1994, the Company paid four monthly distributions of $0.15 per share, totaling $0.60 per share. Prior to the Consolidation on August 15,1994, the Company did not have equivalent shares outstanding so no comparative per share information is presented. |
||
| Other Information
As a result of the Merger on August 17, 1995, the Company assumed a defined benefit
pension plan (the "Plan") covering substantially all of its employees. The board
of directors of the Advisor froze the Plan effective May 31,1995. For each Plan
participant, the accrued benefit earned under the Plan as of May 31,1995 was frozen. The
Plan was terminated on January 2, 1996. As part of the Plans termination, the
Company met its obligation of $2.3 million to the Plan in February 1997. In December 1996, the Company obtained a five year environmental insurance policy on the property portfolio. Based upon the 740 properties in the portfolio at December 31, 1996, the cost of the insurance will be approximately $80,000 per year. The limit of the policy is $10.0 million for each loss and $20.0 million in the aggregate, with a $100,000 deductible. There is a sublimit on properties with underground storage tanks of $1.0 million per occurrence and $5.0 million in the aggregate, with a deductible of $25,000. |
||
| Funds From OperationS (FFO) | ||
| Funds From Operation (FFO) for 1996 was $47.7 million
versus $40.4 million during 1995 and $39.2 million during 1994. Realty Income defines FFO
as net income before net gain on sales of properties and the one-time expenses of the 1994
Consolidation, plus provision for impairment losses, plus depreciation and amortization.
In accordance with the recommendations of the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), amortization of deferred financing costs are not
added back to net income to calculate FFO. Amortization of financing costs are included in
interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. Management considers FFO to be an appropriate measure of the performance of an equity REIT. FFO is used by financial analysts in evaluating REITs and can be one measure of a REITs ability to make cash distribution payments. Presentation of this information provides the reader with an additional measure to compare the performance of different REITs. FFO is not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of the Companys performance or to cash flow from operating, investing, and financing activities as a measure of liquidity or ability to make cash distributions. Below is the reconciliation of net income to funds from operations: |
||
![]() |
||
| For 1996, 1995 and 1994, FFO exceeded cash distributions, excluding the non-recurring special distributions of $5.3 million in 1996 (pertaining to the Advisor Merger) and $5.8 million in 1994 (final distribution for the predecessor partnerships), by $4.9 million, $3.7 million and $369,000, respectively. | ||
| Top | ||
| Results Of Operations | ||
| Prior to the Consolidation on August 15,1994, the capital structure of the Partnerships consisted of limited partner interests with no long term debt. In the Consolidation, limited partners exchanged their partnership units for shares of common stock or Notes of the Company. The general partners did not receive any shares or Notes for their general partner interest. Due to these changes in capital structure, which were caused by the Consolidation, and additional expenses associated with the operations of a publicly traded REIT, the results of operations for the year ended December 31,1994 are not necessarily comparable to 1996 and 1995. | ||
| Comparison of 1996 to 1995 | ||
| Rental revenue was $56.8 million for 1996 versus $51.2
million for 1995, an increase of $5.6 million. The increase in rental revenue was
primarily due to the acquisition of 124 properties from December 1994 through December
1996. These properties generated revenue in 1996 and 1995 of $8.8 million and $3.8
million, respectively, an increase of $5.0 million. During 1997, the contractual lease
payments (not including any percentage rents) on these 124 properties are approximately
$14.0 million. At December 31, 1996, 723 or 98.8% of the Companys leases, on the 732 single-tenant properties, provide for increases in rents through (i) base rent increases tied to a consumer price index with adjustment ceilings or (ii) overage rent based on a percentage of the tenants gross sales. Some leases contain both types of clauses. Rental revenue generated on the 619 properties owned for all of both 1995 and 1996 increased by $871,000 or 1.9%, to $48.0 million from $47.1 million. Percentage rent, which is included in rental revenue, was $1.7 million for 1996 as compared to $1.6 million in 1995. The following table represents Realty Incomes rental revenue by industry for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995: |
||
![]() |
||
| Unleased properties are a factor in determining gross
revenue generated and property costs incurred by the Company. At December 31, 1996, the
Company had nine properties that were not under lease as compared to four properties at
December 31, 1995. The remaining 731 properties were under lease agreements with third
party tenants as of December 31, 1996. The significant portion of the remaining revenue earned during 1996 and 1995 was attributable to interest earned on cash invested in two funds which hold short-term investments in United States government agency securities and treasury securities. Interest revenue was $109,000 for 1996 as compared to $276,000 during 1995. The decrease in interest revenue was due to lower average cash balances held during 1996, which reflects the Companys desire to maintain an appropriate amount of cash as working capital reserves and invest excess available cash in properties. Depreciation and amortization was $16.4 million in 1996 versus $14.8 million in 1995. The $1.6 million increase was primarily due to the depreciation of properties acquired during 1995 and 1996 and amortization of goodwill recorded in connection with the Merger of the Advisor. Total advisor fees and general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.7 million to $5.2 million in 1996 versus $6.9 million in 1995. General and administrative expenses were $5.2 million in 1996 versus $3.2 million in 1995 and advisor fees of $3.7 million in 1995. The $2.0 million increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to the Merger of the Advisor. Subsequent to the Merger, the Company commenced paying for management, accounting systems, office facilities, professional and support personnel expenses (i.e. costs of being self-administered). Prior to August 17, 1995, such costs were the responsibility of the Advisor. During the third quarter of 1996, the Company initiated a 401(k) plan. Costs of $65,000 associated with the plan are included in general and administrative expenses. Property expenses were $1.6 million in 1996 and 1995. Property expenses are broken down into costs associated with multi-tenant non-net lease properties, unleased single-tenant properties and general portfolio expenses. Costs related to the multi-tenant and unleased single-tenant properties include, but are not limited to, property taxes, maintenance, insurance, utilities, site checks, bad debt expense and legal fees. General portfolio costs include, but are not limited to, insurance, legal, site checks and title search fees. Property costs of $1.0 million were incurred on ten multi-tenant properties during 1996, eight of which were owned at the end of 1996. Property costs of $1.0 million were incurred on eleven multi-tenant properties in 1995, ten of which were owned at the end of 1995. During 1996 two multi-tenant properties were sold and in 1995 one multi-tenant property was sold. Costs incurred in 1996 on ten unleased single-tenant properties totaled $250,000 as compared to $161,000 in 1995 on seven unleased single-tenant properties. At December 31, 1996, nine properties were available for lease, one of which was a multi-tenant property. At December 31, 1995, four single-tenant properties were available for lease. The $89,000 increase is due to property taxes, maintenance and utilities on the additional vacant properties. General portfolio costs in 1996 and 1995 totaled $337,000 and $441,000, respectively. The decrease in general portfolio costs is primarily due to a decrease in insurance costs. Interest expense is made up of four components which include: (i) interest on outstanding loans and notes; (ii) commitment fees on the undrawn portion of the credit facility; (iii) amortization of the credit facility origination costs; which are offset by: (iv) interest capitalized on properties under development. Interest capitalized on properties under development is included in the cost of the completed property and amortized over the estimated useful life of the property. Interest expense decreased by $275,000 to $2.4 million in 1996 as compared to $2.6 million for 1995. Interest incurred on loans and notes in 1996 and 1995 was $2.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Interest incurred was $266,000 lower in 1996 than in 1995 due to a decrease in the average outstanding balance and lower interest rates on the acquisition credit facility and the Notes. During 1996, the average outstanding balance and interest rate were $30.7 million and 6.96% as compared to $31.3 million and 7.68% during the comparable period in 1995. Included in the interest incurred in 1996 and 1995 was capitalized interest totaling $150,000 and $217,000, respectively. Commitment fees in 1996 were $156,000 as compared to $127,000 in 1995. In 1996 and 1995, a commitment fee of 0.15% per annum was incurred on the undrawn portion of the credit facility. Commitment fees increased in 1996 because the borrowing capacity was increased to $130 million from $100 million in December 1995. Amortization of the credit facility origination fees were $224,000 in 1996 as compared to $329,000 in 1995. The amortized credit facility origination fees decreased in 1996 as compared to 1995, because in December 1995 the term of the credit facility was extended one year, which extended the period of time over which unamortized fees are amortized. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In 1996, a $579,000 charge was taken to reduce the net carrying value on four properties because they became held for sale. No charge was recorded for an impairment loss in 1995. The Company anticipates property sales will occur in the normal course of business. During 1996, the Company recorded a gain of $1.5 million on the sale of two multi-tenant properties, five restaurant properties and the granting of an easement on another property. During 1995, the Company recorded a net gain of $18,000 on the sale of two child care properties and a multi-tenant property. During 1996 and 1995 cash proceeds generated from these sales were $4.4 million and $617,000, respectively. For 1996, the Company recorded net income of $32.2 million versus $25.6 million in 1995. The $6.6 million increase in net income is primarily due to an increase in rental revenue from 124 properties acquired from December 1994 through December 1996 of $5.0 million, an increase in the net gain on sales of properties of $1.4 million and a net decrease in advisor fees, general and administrative expenses of $1.7 million, offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $1.6 million. |
||
| Top | ||
| Comparison of 1995 to 1994 | ||
| Rental revenue was $51.2 million for 1995 versus $47.9
million for 1994, an increase of $3.3 million. The increase in rental revenue was
primarily due to the acquisition of 62 properties from December 1994 through December
1995. These properties generated revenue of $3.8 million in 1995. Rental revenue generated on 623 properties owned during all of both 1994 and 1995 increased by $681,000 or 1.5%, to $47.3 million from $46.6 million. Percentage rent, which is included in rental revenue, was $1.6 million for 1995 as compared to $2.6 million in 1994. The following table represents Realty Incomes rental revenue by industry for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994: |
||
![]() |
||
| Unleased properties are a factor in determining gross
revenue generated and property costs incurred by the Company. At December 31,1995 and
1994, the Company had four properties that were not under lease, the remaining 681 and 626
properties, respectively, were under lease agreements with third party tenants. The significant portion of the remaining revenue earned during 1995 and 1994 was attributable to interest earned on cash invested in two funds which hold short-term investments in United States government agency securities or direct purchases of short-term United States government agency securities. Interest revenue was $276,000 for 1995 as compared to $862,000 during 1994. The decrease in interest revenue was due to a reduction of cash held, which was invested in properties. Depreciation and amortization was $14.8 million in 1995 versus $13.8 million in 1994. The $1.0 million increase was primarily due to the depreciation of 62 properties acquired from December 1994 through December 31,1995 and amortization of goodwill recorded in connection with the Merger of the Advisor. Total advisor fees and general and administrative expenses decreased by $312,000 to $6.9 million in 1995 versus $7.2 million in 1994. General and administrative expenses were $3.2 million in 1995 versus $1.8 million in 1994. Advisor fees were $3.7 million in 1995 versus $5.4 million in 1994. The $1.4 million increase in general and administrative expenses and $1.7 million decrease in advisor fees was due to the Merger of the Advisor. Subsequent to the Merger, the Company commenced paying for management, accounting systems, office facilities, professional and support personnel expenses (i.e. costs of being self-administered). Such costs were the responsibility of the Advisor through August 17, 1995. The advisor fees for 1995 were calculated in accordance with the terms of the advisory agreement which became effective August 15,1994 and was terminated on August 17,1995. Prior to August 16,1994, advisor fees were calculated in accordance with the terms of the Partnership agreements of the Partnerships. Administration expense in 1994 included approximately $500,000 of one-time expenses primarily associated with the distribution of stock certificates, shareholder informational material and final partnership K-1s to shareholders after the Consolidation had occurred. Other administrative expenses increased in 1995 compared to 1994 due to additional expenses associated with the operation of a publicly traded REIT including, but not limited to, transfer agent fees, NYSE fees, board of directors fees and property acquisition expenses. Property costs decreased to $1.6 million in 1995 as compared to $2.1 million in 1994. The $488,000 decrease was primarily due to a decrease in property taxes, maintenance and utilities. Interest expense for 1995 was $2.6 million as compared to $396,000 for 1994. Of the $2.2 million increase, $1.4 million was for interest paid on the acquisition credit facility in 1995 and an increase of $665,000 of interest paid on the Notes. Interest incurred on loans and notes in 1995 and 1994 was $2.4 million and $354,000, respectively. Interest incurred was higher in 1995 due to borrowings on the credit facility, and senior notes issued as part of the Consolidation. During 1995, the average outstanding balances and interest rates on the acquisition credit facility and the Notes were $31.3 million and 7.68%. Included in the interest incurred in 1995 was capitalized interest totaling $217,000. No interest was capitalized in 1994. Commitment fees in 1995 were $127,000 as compared to $13,000 in 1994. In 1995 and 1994, a commitment fee of 0.15% per annum was incurred on the undrawn portion of the credit facility. Amortization of the credit facility origination fees were $329,000 in 1995 as compared to $29,000 in 1994. Commitment fees and amortization of credit facility origination fees were $329,000 in 1995 as compared to $29,000 in 1994. Commitment fees and amortization of credit facility origination fees increased in 1995 because the credit facility was not entered into until November 1994. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In 1994, a $135,000 charge was taken to reduce the net carrying value on one property because it became held for sale. No charge was recorded for an impairment loss in 1995. |
||
| In 1994, the Company expensed Consolidation costs
aggregating $11.2 million which were nonrecurring costs incurred to effect the
Consolidation. In a manner similar to the pooling-of-interests method of accounting, the
Consolidation costs were charged to expense upon the consummation of the Consolidation.
Such costs included, but were not limited to, fees paid to underwriters, attorneys, and
accountants, as well as costs associated with obtaining a fairness opinion, soliciting the
stockholders, and registering and listing the common stock and the Notes on the NYSE. During 1995, the Company recorded a net gain of $18,000 on the sale of two child care properties and a multi-tenant property. During 1994, the Company recorded a gain of $1.2 million on the sale of five restaurant properties. During 1995 and 1994, cash proceeds generated from these sales were $617,000 and $3.8 million, respectively. For 1995, the Company recorded net income of $25.6 million versus $15.2 million in 1994. The net income in 1994 was negatively impacted by one time Consolidation costs of $11.2 million. Net income for 1994, excluding the Consolidation costs, was $26.4 million. |
||
| Impact Of Inflation | ||
| Tenant leases generally provide for increases in rent as a result of increases in the tenants sales volumes or increases in the consumer price index. Management expects that inflation will cause there lease provisions to result in increases in rent over time. However, inflation and increased costs may have an adverse impact on the tenants if increase in the tenants operating expenses exceed increases in revenue. Approximately 98% of the properties are leased to tenants under net leases in which the tenant is responsible for property costs and expenses. These features in the leases reduce the Companys exposure to rising expenses due to inflation. | ||
| Top | ||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||